Lerne dieses Wort

Kategorien

Video: Why vocabulary matters

Video: Who uses it


Video: What people say
Rewards and prizes!

...not on our brains (human dignity prevents this), but on the CPU of our developers' computers, as they work on the foundation for our new vocabulary module.

Our brains are running red hot as well, and I don't think I've slept without dreaming of words and numbers for weeks.

The shape this project takes is amazing, and there's that great "rocket blast-off" tingling in the tip of my nose; something great is about to happen.

Over the next few blog entries, I'll share with you as I find a bit of time what we're up to. Feedback is very welcome!

Normally, when I explain to my friends what we're up to, their eyes glaze over, because honestly, what our bright LTW engineers are cooking right now is very powerful stuff, and a fairly complex undertaking.

To start with something less abstract than "language," let me give you a brief "stellar" explanation of why I'm so excited about the new LearnThatWord module.

Once upon a time, people would look up at the sky and see a random sprinkling of stars. And air was just invisible nothingness.
Over many thousand years, and through careful observation and analysis, humankind slowly determined that there was an order to the stars, a "cosmos," a system and harmony.

Certain stars could be seen moving in groups, others had a certain quality that distinguished them.

Later on, we started to understand that we are looking at different systems and spheres, five in total, troposphere being the one closest to us, stacked into each other like a Russian doll.



I love this picture, and although I don't know the context it was created for, I see a learner and seeker who managed to break through the core sphere, and who is about to move on to the next. It's one of the most amazing illustrations of the process of "learning" in my mind.

However, once we go above the spheres, we're actually looking at an infinite collection of large units called solar systems. Most of us learned that unless you like to flirt with madness, it is quite enough to concern yourself with our local, hometown universe, since the size and complexity of this one alone will make you nauseated if you try to completely comprehend it.

Over time, humankind learned that what we call "the universe," is simply a word we use to represent something that nobody is actually able to visualize or comprehend. We soothe ourselves by using a term that makes our limitation less obvious, by using a singular term for the infinite vastness. Language is similar in that it gives the impression we're looking at one "thing," where in reality there's only infinite, morphing and evolving grandness.

So, this is how the old astronomers would sketch their astrologic knowledge. Keep this in mind as I make a leap from the stars to the English language, because you will better understand what the new quiz will bring if you visualize it with this structure.
Ok... how this relates to our new module:

Words are not created equal. It's fairly old knowledge that we use some words a lot, and others much less frequently, hence it is more important to know the very common words than the more exotic and obscure ones.

Already in the early part of the last century, people sat down and -- at the time, manually -- looked through large amounts of texts, counting words one by one.

These old frequency lists are still quite relevant today, because they only included a few hundred of the top words. There is not much evolution in high frequency words. They're words like "the" (the number 1), "be" (including it's relatives: am, is, are, was, been, etc.), "I," "you," etc.

This is an excerpt from Wikipedia:
So, owning the core words brings an instant advantaged, a quantum leap towards unlocking a language. Unfortunately, it seems as though progress is made rather slowly after the first 1,000 words.

However, to be fluent in a language, you need above 95% of word proficiency. If you are presented with a text of 100 words, not knowing 5 in them is still a high number, and you will need a lot of energy and concentration to make it through a text or conversation at this level. It's kind of like riding a bicycle with a flat tire. You can do it, but it's bumpy and a pain and you won't find it very fun.
Here's another word estimate:
1_1
2
To reach mastery, you actually need about 15,000-20,000 words, and by words most researchers mean the "word family". So dance, dances, dancing, danced would count as one word. If words were counted more strictly, without combining them into a "root word" or "word family" or "lemma," the number of words you'd need to know would be much, much larger.

There are countless ways to learn the 1,000 core words, because that's what many, many publishers focus on. It's a waste of energy, because these "core words" are words you'll learn nearly automatically anyway, and quite effortlessly. You'll encounter them everywhere, so your brain can easily build automaticity around them.

Going beyond these core words, effective support quickly dissipates and it becomes exponentially more difficult to learn.

To provide tutoring along the full frequency strand is possible only for LTW, being the only program designed around a comprehensive vocabulary data set of now 180,000 words (and continuously growing).

The meaning of 80/20 to language
Was verschiedene Sprachprogramme vorschlagen, ist, dass, wenn Sie die Top-1.000-oder 2.000 Wörter lernen Sie in der Nähe zur Meisterschaft sind.

Once you look closer, though, you'll find that these 1,000 core words are words that you will naturally pick up rather quickly; they are really very basic. However, to master living language, you need to be able to fill in the more advanced words in synergy with these core words to actually get something out of them. Meaning is most commonly communicated through the more advanced vocabulary, the more specific words.

Here are some randomly picked lines. Blanked out are the words with frequency rank larger than 1,000:

The world is very xxxxxxx.
Do you like your xxxxxx?
What do you think about xxxxxx?
I can't believe it's xxxxxx!

Was alle diese Sätze gemeinsam haben, ist, dass sie Kern Worte zu benutzen für 80% der Textmenge.

Try it for yourself:
Take an average, casual text and blank out all the slightly more specific or advanced words. You'll see the 80/20 proportion (or something very similar). You'll also see that the text has become very hard to understand. If the text is slightly more specific, your primary core vocabulary, while essential, takes you nowhere at all.

Es ist die 80/20, was alle immer wieder.

Good news is that researchers (including our own team at LTW) have been setting the big data monsters on the trail of the English language all over the world, investigating its structure from all different angles, and a "language cosmos" is starting to reveal itself.

The data monster has been digesting incredible amounts of words and has produced a lot of very valuable data sets, so that we now not only know the top 20,000 word families, but far beyond.

An exciting time to be in linguistics! Or language tutoring... 😉

Vocabulary spheres

Using this data and a few important aspects I'll explain in future entries, it is possible to divide the language cosmos into spheres (remember the image above?). It allows us to give a scientifically and statistically sound approach to learning English. Once you reach general proficiency, you may choose to expand further into more specialized vocabulary areas (it's like launching into a new solar system).

Our new vocabulary assessment tool will allow users to tell us what their unique focus is:
Maybe you want to
- focus on spoken language only,
- prepare for medical school,
- ... or business communications,
- ... or explore humanities or social sciences,
- ... or be on equal verbal turf with lawyers?

Tell our program what you're looking to accomplish and we will prep you accordingly. We have an incredible general frequency list. But, in addition to that, we havetwelve (12) more specific frequency strings, each for a different learning focus and each extensive and comprehensive.

So with this frequency data, it is possible to break up the language learning progress into a cosmos of different spheres, and determine incredible accuracy how much space you already cover, in terms of vocabulary. Knowing what you know allows you to optimize which words you might want to learn next, so they're not too easy or too advanced.

We're excited to build an easy and effective vocabulary assessment tool right after launching our new vocabulary module. It will be online, interactive and allow users to determine their location in the English Word-iverse in a few minutes.

If you share our passion for learning and would love to wear sponsor laurels, please get in touch.

Frequency data is one of the core pillars of this project, but only one of them. I will post some more of the logic of the new algorithm as we go along, so please consider subscribing to this blog or joining us on Facebook...
Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in LearnThatWord, Technologie, Web-Entwicklung und markiert , . | Leave a comment |

LearnThatWord was nominated today as a finalist for two CODiE awards:
  • Best K-12 Instructional Solution
  • Best Reading/English Instructional Solution

    The CODiE awards are given annually by the Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA) based on selections made by a jury of judges from the industry and voting among industry peers. We're delighted!

  • Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in LearnThatWord, Technologie, Web-Entwicklung und markiert , , . | Leave a comment |

    Eingegangen unsere erste Spende zu erhalten und zu erweitern Wortschatz Junction ins nächste Jahr ...

    Would like to take part? There's a donation button and thermometer on the über uns Seite.

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in Wortschatz Junction. | Leave a comment |

    We're constantly working behind the scenes to improve LTW. Many of these things you'll notice as improved speed or better data for the words, but here a few noteworthy recent upgrades:

    Wenn Sie über Wortschatz Tutor studieren, haben Sie die Möglichkeit, ein Wort über die Definition / image / Beispielsatz basierend bevor Sie auf die Audio-Taste zu finden.

    If you are spending coins on your reward page, it will now prompt you to confirm that you want a particular item, since in the past sometimes members clicked at multiple items not aware that it would deduct coins for each activity. If you choose to get learning credits as your reward, you can see how many learning credits you have in your student portal now, even if you're a member.

    Und weil Mitglieder Quiz häufiger jetzt, dass sie dafür belohnt zu neigen, haben wir ein 6-Stunden-Warteliste Feature, dass Wörter werden durch die Praxis Zyklus bewegen sich zu schnell verhindert.

    Neues Feature: Wenn Quiz in kurzen Sequenz neu gestartet werden, bevor der Praxis Wörter, die vorgestellt wurden nicht wieder gezeigt werden, bis 6 Stunden seit der letzten Überprüfung bestanden haben.

    Unser Ziel für LTW ist Perfektion und unsere To-do-Liste ist lang ...

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in LearnThatWord, Web-Entwicklung und markiert . | Leave a comment |

    Ein großer Schritt, um LearnThatWord eine einfache, One-Click-Wahl für Schulen: Wir sind jetzt in der Google Apps Marketplace.

    Schulen mit dem kostenlosen Google Apps for Education-Programm können nun LearnThatWord für Lehrer und Schüler mit einem Klick.

    Ohne Pro-Kopf-Lizenzgebühren - - Da unser Programm wird durch die-Sorglos, erschwinglich und 100% gemessen Pay-Per-Result-Konzept angeboten, es ist leicht zu bekommen alle durch den Google Apps Marketplace gestartet.

    Studenten erhalten kostenlos 5 Learning Credits je, Schulen 100 zusätzliche Credits.

    Darüber hinaus studieren alle Drittklässler kostenlos mit unserem Wortschatz Junction Kampagne.

    Klicken Sie hier, um es zu Google Apps for Education Konto jetzt hinzufügen:

     

    Klicken Sie hier Wenn Sie noch nicht über ein kostenloses Google Apps for Education Account und möchte, um loszulegen.

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in Uncategorized. | Leave a comment |

    I live in a great place. Little Sebastopol in Sonoma County, home to a lot of conscientious and smart people, and among them the good folks at O'Reillys.
    Heute kam ich in einer Diskussion über den Wert der Praxis, die in den folgenden Zeilen, die Ich mag zu teilen, würde gipfelte:

    My point this morning was in large part that repetition and drill matter, and that once you've figured out that they're actually helping you, they 'suck' viel weniger.
    It's not just a matter of Calvinist ethics (sorry, Kurt) - it's an opportunity for learners to move forward by doing things a lot, shifting ahead a bit at a time. The great leaps are fun as well, but build on smaller steps.
    Meine Sorge dabei ist, dass während der Vermietung Kinder herausfinden, was für sie eine gute Idee ist und dass verschiedene Kinder werden herausfinden, verschiedene Dinge, eigentlich immer auf die Dinge gut ist über viel mehr als sie zu entdecken oder schaffen sie.
    Reading sheet music is one thing - learning to play an instrument is another. And I figured out what integration and differentiation were about long before I got to calculus, but I probably should have flunked my second semester of calculus because I just couldn't wrap my head around how to actually make it work. (Which shocked me, because math up to then had just flowed naturally for me.)
    Ideally I'd love to have discovery and creativity motivate learners' Aktionen - aber sie müssen noch die Lernenden in eine enorme Menge an Wiederholung, um dorthin zu gelangen motivieren.
    Kurt said 'Computers and the internet can be used to scale the learning by discovery paradigm.' Ja, und sie können auch verwendet werden, zu verwalten, zu moderieren und die Feinabstimmung Wiederholung werden. "

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in Uncategorized. | Leave a comment |

    ...
    LearnThatWord Anwender jetzt verdienen Sie Münzen für das Ausfüllen Quiz! La Linea Cartoons, Spiele zum kostenlosen Learning Credits usw. Immerhin ist die größte Herausforderung, über das Lernen hält den Schwung und motiviert zu bleiben!
    Belohnungen, ob sie Diplome oder Preise sind, sind für bestimmte Anstrengung und quality, nicht vorhandene Leistung.
    Komm check it out, und lassen Sie mich wissen, was Sie denken!

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in Uncategorized. | Leave a comment |

    Der folgende Auszug ist ein Text an mir gestern durch die delanceyplace.com Snippet Kollektor, einer der wenigen E-Mails lese ich gerne, wenn ich die Zeit zu finden:

    "We tend to be cognitive misers. When approaching a problem, we can choose from any of several cognitive mechanisms. Some mechanisms have great computational power, letting us solve many problems with great accuracy, but they are slow, require much concentration and can interfere with other cognitive tasks. Others are comparatively low in computational power, but they are fast, require little concentration and do not interfere with other ongoing cognition. Humans are cognitive misers because our basic tendency is to default to the processing mechanisms that require less computational effort, even if they are less accurate. Are you a cognitive miser? Consider the following problem, taken from the work of Hector Levesque, a computer scientist at the University of Toronto. Try to answer it yourself before reading the solution.

    Problem: Jack ist bei Anne, Anne, aber bei George suchen.

    A) Ja
    B) Nr.
    C) Kann nicht bestimmt werden

    "More than 80 percent of people choose C. But the correct answer is A. Here is how to think it through logically: Anne is the only person whose marital status is unknown. You need to consider both possibilities, either married or unmarried, to determine whether you have enough information to draw a conclusion. If Anne is married, the answer is A: she would be the married person who is looking at an unmarried person (George). If Anne is not married, the answer is still A: in this case, Jack is the married person, and he is looking at Anne, the unmarried person. This thought process is called fully disjunctive reasoning - reasoning that considers all possibilities. The fact that the problem does not reveal whether Anne is or is not married suggests to people that they do not have enough information, and they make the easiest inference (C) without thinking through all the possibilities. Most people can carry out fully disjunctive reasoning when they are explicitly told that it is necessary (as when there is no option like 'cannot be determined' verfügbar).

    "Here is another test of cognitive miserliness, as described by Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman and his colleague Shane Frederick.

    "A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?

    "Many people give the first response that comes to mind - 10 cents. But if they thought a little harder, they would realize that this cannot be right: the bat would then have to cost $1.10, for a total of $1.20. IQ is no guarantee against this error. Kahneman and Frederick found that large numbers of highly select university students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton and Harvard were cognitive misers, just like the rest of us, when given this and similar problems."

    Autor: Keith E. Stanovich
    Title: "Rational and Irrational Thought: The Thinking That IQ Tests Miss"
    Herausgeber: Scientific American
    Date: November / Dezember 2009
    Seiten: 35-36

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in Uncategorized. | Leave a comment |

    Here a few lines by Benedict Carey, "Forget What You Know About Good Study Habits," The New York Times, 6. September 2010 ...

     

    " 'We have known these principles [for improved study] for some time, and it's intriguing that schools don't pick them up, or that people don't learn them by trial and error,' said Robert A. Bjork, a psychologist at the University of California, Los Angeles. 'Instead, we walk around with all sorts of unexamined beliefs about what works that are mistaken.' (...)

    Nehmen Sie die Vorstellung, dass Kinder bestimmte haben Lernstile, that some are 'visual learners' and others are auditory; some are "linken Gehirnhälfte" students, others "rechten Gehirnhälfte." In a recent review of the relevant research, published in the journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest, a team of psychologists found fast Null Unterstützung für solche Ideen.
    Kognitive Wissenschaftler bestreiten nicht, dass ehrliche-to-Güte pauken kann auf eine bessere Note in einem bestimmten Prüfung führen. Abstand - improves later recall without requiring students to put in more overall study effort or pay more attention, dozens of studies have found." Just as every craft requires specific materials, so too does cultural attire, with platforms like garazastyle.fi providing essential abaya vaate.

     

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in Uncategorized. | Leave a comment |

    Nur über dieses Programm gestolpert ...
    http://cltl.umassd.edu/home-flash.cfm

     

    Sträflinge in MA in einem Lese-Programm als Alternative zu seiner Verurteilung zu beteiligen.

     

    Die Zahlen zeigen, dass die Teilnehmer zurück zu kriminellem Verhalten bei einer Rate drastisch reduziert.

    Verfasst per E-Mail aus LearnThat Blog

    Geschrieben von Rosevita Warda in Uncategorized. | Leave a comment |